Your current approach is on the board
Every run scores a baseline, a plain regression, gradient-boosted trees and foundation models on the same time-based folds. The simpler model wins when scores are within one standard error.
Upload a spreadsheet of customers, loans, machines or orders. The Workbench runs today's tabular foundation models and gradient-boosted trees against your own history, validates them the way your reviewers expect, and shows which one to trust.
Free for a month: five runs, up to 50,000 rows each. No card, no installation.
| loan_id | opened | months | utilisation · 6m | late · 12m | fell_behind_90d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-1041 | 2024-03 | 31 | 3 | yes | |
| L-1178 | 2024-07 | 27 | 0 | no | |
| L-1302 | 2025-01 | 21 | 1 | no | |
| L-1455 | 2025-06 | 16 | 2 | yes | |
| L-1590 | 2025-11 | 11 | 0 | blankto predict | |
| L-1627 | 2026-02 | 8 | 1 | blankto predict |
Two seeded projects, recorded end to end. A table like yours runs the same way.
Every run produces the same four things, on your own table, inside your own workspace.
Every run scores a baseline, a plain regression, gradient-boosted trees and foundation models on the same time-based folds. The simpler model wins when scores are within one standard error.
Yes/no questions get a probability with a calibration check. Numbers get an 80% range. Each row shows the strongest drivers behind it.
Move the cut-off and see approvals, expected misses and the business impact on your own base rate.
The chosen model is frozen at a deployment date and replayed forward. Drift in any input raises a warning or an alert.
No feature pipeline to build and no model to configure. Bring the table, confirm three guesses, press Run.
One row for each thing you want a prediction for. The outcome you want to know as a column, blank where it is not known yet; those rows get predicted. An ID per row and a date if you have one, so every test trains on the past and scores the future.
The Workbench proposes the target, the ID and the date column. Check them and press Run. Columns that look like personal data are flagged so you can drop them before anything is stored.
Most runs finish in a few minutes. Every decision the feature screen made is listed, with the with-and-without comparison.
| ID | Months on book | Utilisation · 12m | Payments · 12m | Income Δ | Probability · 90% band | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | Utilisation 32%, 35%, 38%, 41%, 47%, 52%, 55%, 61%, 66%, 72%, 77%, 81% | -18% | 0.42 | High | ||
| 64 | Utilisation 21%, 20%, 22%, 19%, 20%, 21%, 20%, 18%, 20%, 19%, 21%, 20% | +4% | <0.01 | Low | ||
| 12 | Utilisation 48%, 62%, 41%, 66%, 52%, 58%, 44%, 69%, 51%, 60%, 57%, 55% | 0% | 0.02 | Low | ||
| 1 | Utilisation 40% | — | 0.18 | Review | ||
| 27 | Utilisation 70%, 68%, 66%, 62%, 60%, 57%, 53%, 50%, 48%, 45%, 42%, 40% | +9% | <0.01 | Low | ||
| 45 | Utilisation 60%, 62%, 65%, 68%, 70%, 74%, 77%, 80%, 83%, 86%, 88%, 90% | -6% | 0.48 | High | ||
| 19 | Utilisation 30%, 31%, 30%, 29%, 30%, 31%, 30%, 30%, 29%, 30%, 31%, 30% | +2% | 0.01 | Low | ||
| 8 | Utilisation 10%, 12%, 11%, 10%, 14%, 38%, 55%, 64% | -30% | 0.13 | Watch |
An illustration of what one scored row looks like: the probability, its range, the drivers behind it and a status. Switch the table to see the same format on a different question. All rows and scores here are synthetic examples; the real thing, on your own data, is in the Workbench.
Whether the reviewer is a bank's model-risk team or a COO, a run shows its work. We start with financial services, the strictest review there is.
Folds train on the past and score the future. A leakage test scrambles every row after the cut-off and checks that no feature changes.
The naive answer, a plain regression and gradient-boosted trees sit next to the foundation models. Sometimes the simpler one wins. Then it wins.
80% ranges on numbers. Calibration curves on probabilities. The strongest drivers for each row, signed.
Population stability on every input, with warn and alert thresholds, and the score replayed month by month.
The model scores live cases. Your current process keeps deciding.
Both compared on the same cases.
Your reviewers check backtests, calibration and drivers.
In production, with your current process as the fallback for rows flagged for review.
Results from the free month are for evaluation. Production use needs the review your field requires, such as a fair-lending or model-risk review, and that is what the pilot is for.
Prior-data fitted networks are trained once across millions of synthetic datasets. Shown a new table, they find the pattern in a single forward pass, with no training on your data and no model to maintain.
A transformer learns from millions of synthetic records: what trends, seasonality, noise and shocks look like.
Finds the pattern, shows its uncertainty. No retraining.
Hollmann and colleagues showed a prior-data fitted network matching four hours of expert tuning in seconds. Models of that family are what the Workbench runs: three tabular foundation models and one time-series foundation model, next to gradient-boosted trees, with the leaderboard deciding. How it works
Every industry runs on rows and columns that change over time. The same run answers each one's question. We start with financial services.
Every model runs on our own machine. No row of your data goes to any outside service.
Columns that look like personal data are flagged at upload, and you can drop them before anything is stored. The models do not need names, emails or ID numbers.
Only your workspace sees your projects. The sample projects are the one thing every workspace shares, and they use public or generated data.
Files are kept for 30 days after the last run, or deleted the moment you press Delete. HTTPS on the way in, an encrypted disk on the server.
A pilot can run inside your own environment, with the same leaderboard, ranges and monitoring. Ask on the form.
Everything the Workbench produces, on a table you choose, with nothing to install. We ask for feedback in return.
When a run shows something worth acting on, the next step is a pilot next to your current model, in our environment or yours. Tell us what you need and we reply with a plan and a price.
Request your free monthShort answers to the questions that come up before the first upload. The guide inside the Workbench covers every screen.
Something else?hello@knoww.ai
One table, one row per thing, the outcome as a column, blank where it is not known yet. An ID for each row, and a date if you have one. CSV or Excel, up to 50,000 rows and 500 columns in the free month.
Today's tabular models read a snapshot. Knoww is building the one that reads a history.
In 2026 SAP bought the lab behind TabPFN and Nvidia bought the company behind the first relational foundation model. Both bets say the same thing: the valuable prediction problems in a business live in tables, and a model can be pretrained to learn them from the rows you hand it.
LTFM, the model Knoww is building, is a longitudinal tabular foundation model. It reads entities, their state and their history, so the same model answers questions about change. The Workbench is where that work meets real tables.
Five runs, 50,000 rows each, free for a month. Tell us the question and what you use today. We review every request by hand and email you when your workspace is ready. If you already know you want a pilot next to your current model, say so below.